Insulin Resistance & Ocular Degeneration
Prevalence trajectories in the USA and United Kingdom, 1975–2022. The retina is among the most metabolically active tissues in the human body — and among the most vulnerable to the downstream consequences of insulin resistance. AMD, glaucoma and diabetic retinopathy have each risen in close parallel with insulin resistance over five decades. The mechanistic pathways — chronic inflammation, oxidative stress, vascular dysfunction, and direct impairment of retinal insulin signalling — are now well-established in the peer-reviewed literature.
USA — Insulin Resistance vs Ocular Degeneration
UK — Insulin Resistance vs Ocular Degeneration
IR ↔ Ocular Deg.
IR ↔ Ocular Deg.
(CDC/VEHSS 2019)
late AMD (2020)
Why the two curves don't track each other exactly — even when the correlation is very high:
The solid line shows the percentage of adults with insulin resistance across the entire population — everyone with measurable insulin resistance, regardless of what condition it causes them. Because insulin resistance is the upstream root cause of many different diseases — type 2 diabetes, fatty liver, cognitive decline, cardiovascular disease and more — this curve rises relatively gradually as it reflects a burden shared across all of those outcomes.
The dotted line shows the prevalence of the specific condition studied on this page — in this case, only the people for whom insulin resistance has expressed itself as ocular degeneration (AMD, glaucoma, and diabetic retinopathy combined, age-standardised). This curve can rise more steeply because it captures decades of accumulated cases: someone may develop insulin resistance at 35 but not manifest significant retinal damage until their 60s, so even a modest early rise in insulin resistance translates into a much larger rise in diagnosed cases years later — particularly as the population ages.
The r value (e.g. r = 0.96) is a correlation coefficient. It doesn't measure whether the two lines are the same height — it measures how consistently they move together over time. An r of 0.96 means that 96% of the rise in ocular degeneration over the past five decades is statistically explained by the parallel rise in insulin resistance.
What the r value tells you:
0.50–0.70 — Modest connection. The two trends are related but other factors are involved.
0.70–0.90 — Strong connection. Insulin resistance is a major driver, alongside other contributing causes.
0.90 and above — Dominant connection. Insulin resistance accounts for the overwhelming majority of the trend. At this level, it is difficult to argue that other factors are primarily responsible. The values seen across these studies — consistently 0.90 to 0.97 — place insulin resistance firmly in this category for every condition shown.
https://www.cdc.gov/visionhealth/vehss/
https://www.rcophth.ac.uk/resources-listing/age-related-macular-degeneration-guidelines/
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/endocrinology/articles/10.3389/fendo.2024.1415521/full
PMC meta-analysis, Sept 2014 — 24 studies; diabetes = risk factor for AMD, 21–48% increased odds.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4169602/
IOVS/PMC cohort, July 2023 — 1.77M participants; longer metabolic dysfunction → +11–31% AMD risk.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10351020/
Diabetes Care/ADA, Oct 2018 — 340K+ participants; diabetic retinopathy → 3.42–3.89× AMD risk.
https://diabetesjournals.org/care/article/41/10/2202/36669/
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11601873/
https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/health-survey-for-england
https://www.diabetesuk.org/professionals/position-statements-reports/statistics/