Insulin Resistance & Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
Prevalence trajectories in the USA and United Kingdom, 1975–2022. This data is for people over 50 only, for example the UK data of 12.1% relates to about 2-3% of the total population. Insulin resistance estimated from HOMA-IR survey data and proxy metabolic markers. AMD prevalence from national health surveys and ophthalmology registries. The retina is among the most metabolically active tissues in the human body — and among the most vulnerable to the downstream consequences of insulin resistance.
The reason for the over-50 data cut-off is simply that AMD becomes clinically diagnosable and measurable in that age group. It's not that younger people are unaffected by the underlying metabolic process — it is that the damage hasn't yet accumulated enough to show up on a retinal scan or produce symptoms. The registries and studies that generated the prevalence data were designed around the 50+ population for that practical reason. The 50-year correlation data places AMD firmly alongside Alzheimer's disease and stroke in the "dominant" strength category.
USA — Insulin Resistance vs AMD
UK — Insulin Resistance vs AMD
IR ↔ AMD
IR ↔ AMD
1975–2022
1975–2022
Why the two curves don't track each other exactly — even when the correlation is very high:
The solid line shows the percentage of adults with insulin resistance across the entire population — everyone with measurable insulin resistance, regardless of what condition it causes them. Because insulin resistance is the upstream root cause of many different diseases — type 2 diabetes, fatty liver, cognitive decline, cardiovascular disease and more — this curve rises relatively gradually as it reflects a burden shared across all of those outcomes.
The dotted line shows the prevalence of the specific condition studied on this page — in this case, only the people for whom insulin resistance has expressed itself as AMD. This curve can rise more steeply because it captures decades of accumulated cases: someone may develop insulin resistance at 35 but not manifest significant retinal damage until their 60s, so even a modest early rise in insulin resistance translates into a much larger rise in diagnosed cases years later.
The r value (e.g. r = 0.91) is a correlation coefficient. It doesn't measure whether the two lines are the same height — it measures how consistently they move together over time. An r of 0.91 means that 91% of the rise in AMD over the past five decades is statistically explained by the parallel rise in insulin resistance.
What the r value tells you:
0.50–0.70 — Modest connection. The two trends are related but other factors are involved.
0.70–0.90 — Strong connection. Insulin resistance is a major driver, alongside other contributing causes.
0.90 and above — Dominant connection. Insulin resistance accounts for the overwhelming majority of the trend. At this level, it is difficult to argue that other factors are primarily responsible. The values seen across these studies — consistently 0.90 to 0.97 — place insulin resistance firmly in this category for every condition shown.
The stage of AMD matters. In early to intermediate dry AMD, removing the metabolic stimulus through VLC diet and intermittent fasting can realistically halt progression and may reduce drusen burden over time as RPE autophagy is restored. In later-stage AMD where photoreceptor and RPE tissue has already been lost, that structural damage is permanent — but intervention still protects remaining vision and addresses the systemic IR that is simultaneously driving other conditions. This is one reason early HOMA-IR testing in the 40s and 50s is so clinically significant: AMD is far more tractable before structural loss has occurred.
https://www.cdc.gov/visionhealth/vehss/
https://www.rcophth.ac.uk/resources-listing/age-related-macular-degeneration-guidelines/
Roddy GW et al. Surv Ophthalmol 2020 — systematic review: IR is an independent modifiable AMD risk factor via VEGF, complement, oxidative stress, and impaired RPE autophagy.
Colijn JM et al. Ophthalmology 2017 — Rotterdam Study: highest glycaemic load quartile = 49% greater incident AMD risk.
Chiu CJ et al. Am J Clin Nutr 2007 — AREDS: high glycaemic index diet independently predicts AMD progression over 5 years.
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/endocrinology/articles/10.3389/fendo.2024.1415521/full
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4169602/
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11601873/
https://www.diabetesuk.org/professionals/position-statements-reports/statistics/